Is the Official Version of 9/11 a Lie?

The events surrounding WTC7 or “Building 7″ of the World Trade Center (WTC) complex are regarded as by many of the individuals looking for the truth about 9/11 to be the “smoking gun” that irrefutably indicates foul play. While I am of the opinion that all the evidence which points to some kind of 9/11 conspiracy is equaling convincing, the destruction of WTC7 is inarguably the most blatant.

What is WTC7?
Although the Twin Towers were the most famous, the World Trade Center Complex was actually comprised of seven distinct office buildings (with the towers themselves being 1 and 2.) Building #7 was a 47 story skyscraper that was also destroyed on September 11th… and yet millions of folks have never heard of it. There is no question that the building fell, but apart from some sporadic coverage on the day of the occasion no mention was given to it in any of the subsequent television footage connected to 9/11.

But why not? We’re talking about the destruction of the building that housed such agencies as the US Secret Service, the CIA, the IRS, the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the NYC mayor’s Office of Emergency Management.

Controlled Demolition
Because WTC7 doesn’t add up, that’s why not. At this pointt I encourage you to visit YouTube and look up the actual television footage of the collapse — it won’t take long, simply because the building collapsed in 6.5 mere seconds at freefall speeds (that means it was dropping completely unobstructed.) And if you don’t think that appeared like a controlled demolition, you’ve most likely never observed one before.

Consider the following: 

• WTC7 collapsed without having apparent cause at 5:20 PM, over six hrs after the towers collapsed.

• WTC7 collapsed in 6.5 mere seconds (at freefall pace) with great symmetry and landed precisely in its own footprint. The average particles discipline radius was only 70 feet.

I could write a independent article on those two factors alone, and why they’re so profoundly damning.

Why did WTC7 Officially Fall?
The official account says that WTC7 was seriously damaged by debris from the collapse of WTC1, which started fires that burned for numerous hours and resulted in its collapse. Nonetheless, if that’s truly the case… 

• WTC7 is the 3rd steel-framed building ever, in the history of the world, to collapse due to fire.
• And the initially two? The WTC Twin Towers.
• The structures immediately adjoining to WTC7 and equidistant from the falling towers (a Verizon building and USPO) by some means sustained only minimal damage from the debris of the towers, did not catch fire, and were in no way structurally threatened. Not even close.
• WTC Buildings 5 and 6 were directly in between WTC7 and the towers, and appreciably nearer to the base of the towers than WTC7 was. They were rained with particles from WTC1 and sustained heavy damage. Neither of them collapsed.
• Ongoing tv footage throughout the day showed two relatively insignificant fires isolated on two of the building’s 47 stories. On top of that, there is no definitive footage of the supposedly large amount of damage that WTC7 alone sustained out of all the buildings that were a equivalent distance away from WTC1.

Is all this possible, or even propable? Perhaps, when you consider that individuals seriously believe WTC2 collapsed due to fire after burning for only 56 minutes — even though there are documented records of structures a lot older and less well built burning for upward of 15 hrs and not collapsing, not even becoming structurally unsound.

Prior Knowledge
WTC7 isn’t known as the smoking gun for nothing. The evidence just keeps piling up. In addition to all of this, both CNN and the BBC broadcast news of the collapse of WTC7 nearly a full hr earlier than it actually fell. In both instances, the building was plainly noticeable in the background of the live news feed. 

Many news anchors and reporters described the destruction of all 3 WTC buildingss (1, 2 and 7) as looking “just like one of those controlled demolitions.” Quite a few of the witnesses and rescue workers in the neighborhood of WTC7 at the time of the collapse noted an actual countdown and a general air of expectancy immediately prior.The owner of the WTC complex is recorded on national tv explaining how he gave the order to “pull” WTC7 —  a phrase widely utilized in the controlled demolition industry to refer to the destruction of a building.

Swept Under the Rug
If it is true that WTC7 fell due to structural damage induced by fire, why was their no further investigation? If WTC7 failed so effortlessly due to absolutely nothing more than fire, it would establish a new precedent for both the construction of skyscrapers and the way firefighters respond to them in emergency situations. Instead of examining the particles and figuring out exactly where the failures occurred, as would usually be the case, the wreckage of the building was collected and disposed of immediately, allowing no possibility for analysis or research. The same is true for the remains of the towers, which was gathered and auctioned as scrap to the lowest bidder.

This is just the barest bones of all the discrepancies and concealed info that exists in the wake of Building 7’s collapse. This write-up doesn’t even cover the explosions a lot of people reported hearing, the inexplicable destruction of the lobby on the ground floor or the astonishing eyewitness testimony of Barry Jennings, who was actually inside WTC7 when both the towers fell.
WTC7 is not mentioned in the 9/11 Commission Report.

All of the information included in this article is accurate and verifiable fact. Make sure you take a look at BuildingWhat.org, WTC7.net and 911Review.org or look for “constructing 7″ on Youtube for a lot more facts. Do your own research, and draw your own conclusions — the reality deserves no less.